|
Appendix
1: Territorial Forecasting Methodology
Introduction
1.
The recommended territorial forecasting approach utilises
econometric forecasting techniques to forecast total demand for
retail floorspace. The approach adopts three simple economic
theories which each use a number of independent variables as
indicators of the total demand for retail floorspace. Indicators
which show a statistical relationship to the dependent variable -
total demand - are used to predict its future value. This
appendix presents the forecasting approach in a series of
sequential steps.
Step 1- Adopt Economic Theories
2.
Three simple economic theories are used to identify appropriate
independent variables:
- consumer expenditure (demand),
i.e. the level of consumer expenditure is the
principle influence upon the quantity of retail
floorspace. The greater the level of consumer
expenditure, the more retail floorspace will be
required;
- performance and
characteristics of the retail industry (factors of
production), i.e. the structure and
organisation of the industry in any one year is the
principle influence upon the quantity of retail
floorspace. The greater the level of activity, the
more retail floorspace will be required; and
- performance and
indicators of the retail property market (supply), i.e.
the supply or demand for retail floorspace in the
preceding year, and the rent/price of that floorspace,
is the principle influence upon the demand for retail
floorspace. The demand is a result of the interplay
between supply and price.
Step 2 - Construct Database
3.
The forecasting approach adopts the use of regression analysis.
Variables are divided into:
- dependent variable -
the future value is predicted using the independent
variable. The dependent variable adopted for model
testing is the total demand for private retail
floorspace (i.e. total stock minus vacancy).
This represents the total occupied IFA of retail
premises; and
- independent variable -
used to predict the future values of the dependent
variable. The independent variables, and their
expected signing, are presented in Table A1.1.
Table
A1.1: Independent Variables and their Expected Signing
with Retail Total Demand
[ Table
Summary ]
| Economic Theory/Independent
Variables |
Expected
Relationship with Total Demand for Retail Floorspace
|
| Consumer Expenditure (Demand) -
Gross Domestic Product, Local Population, Working
Population, Visitor Arrivals, Average Labour Earnings,
Local Retail Expenditure, Visitor Retail Expenditure |
Positive |
| Retail Industry (Supply) - Retail
Employment, Retail Establishments, Retail Sales,
Value Added, Average Unit size |
Positive |
| Average employment per unit floor area |
Negative |
| Property Market (Factor of Production)
- Lagged total demand of private retail premises,
Supply of Private Retail Premises |
Positive |
| Price of Private Retail Premises, Rental
of Private Retail Premises, Property Construction
Costs |
Negative |
4.
For both the dependent and independent variables, time series
historical data are collected from 1976 where possible. Where
statistics back to 1976 are not available, the missing values are
estimated. Lagged, log transformed and lagged log transformed
values of each variable are also incorporated into the database
for model testing.
Step 3 - Model Testing
5.
The database is subjected to statistical tests in "SPSS for
Windows". This generates a number of potential equations.
They must satisfy the following standard requirements:
- signs on the independent
variables are consistent with the applicable theory;
- the f-test must show that
at least one of the independent variables is
significant. The probability associated with the F
value must be smaller than 0.01;
- the t-value associated
with each independent variable is significant. The t-values
must be less than 0.05;
- the adjusted R2
values indicate the 'goodness of fit'
of the model with the dependent variable. The
adjusted R2 should be greater than 0.90;
- residual analysis should
show that the assumptions behind regression analysis
have not been violated. No assumptions should be
violated;
- a good historical fit for
the past 20 years by "backtrending" the
forecasts over the past 20 years; and
- the results of the models
should indicate realistic and plausible forecasts
when compared to the current market sentiment.
6.
The model testing undertaken in 1997 produced the following six
forecasting models:
Equation 1:
Total Demand year t = - 5.986 + 4.556
ln( Local
Population year t-2 )
+ 7.845 ln ( Visitor Retail Expenditure year t )
Equation 2:
Total Demand year t = - 8.179 + 6.329
ln( Visitor
Retail Expenditure year t )
+ 4.947 ln( Working Population year
t-1 )
Equation 3:
Total Demand year t = 3.710 + 12.647 ( Retail
Employment year t ) -
5.451( Average Retail Employment per Unit Floor
Area yeart-1 )
Equation 4:
Total Demand year t = 2.858 + 38.654 ( Total
Demand year t-1 ) - 3.197
( Retail Property Price year
t )
Equation 5:
Total Demand year t = - 16.632 + 6.190
ln( Visitor
Arrivals year t ) + 2.426 ln( Retail Sales
year t )
- 2.961 ln( Retail Property Price year
t )
Equation 6:
Total Demand year t = - 8.862 + 6.923 ( Visitor
Arrivals year t ) + 10.004 ln( Retail Sales year t )
- 5.406 ( Retail Property Price year
t )
where ln = natural
logarithm
7.
The models can be re-calibrated and new models can be constructed
annually utilizing new data for the dependent and independent
variables.
Step 4 - Develop Floorspace
Forecasts
8.
Forecast data for all the independent variables of the preferred
equations are generated. The forecast data are fed into the
preferred equations to produce a "range" of floorspace
forecasts. The forecasts for the total retail floorspace demand
via the six forecasting models utilising data available in year
1997 are outlined in Table A1.2 below:
Table
A1.2: Model Forecasting Results
[ Simple
Table Format ]
Equation No.
|
Total Demand for
Retail Floorspace (million sq.m. IFA)
|
1995
|
2001
|
2006
|
2011
|
| Equation 1 |
7.6
|
8.8
|
9.8
|
10.8
|
| Equation 2 |
7.7
|
8.9
|
9.9
|
10.8
|
| Equation 3 |
7.1
|
7.3
|
7.3
|
7.2
|
| Equation 4 |
7.5
|
8.1
|
8.5
|
8.9
|
| Equation 5 |
7.6
|
8.6
|
9.3
|
9.9
|
| Equation 6 |
7.7
|
9.6
|
11.1
|
12.7
|
9.
The forecast range produced by the six equations ranges from 7.2
to 12.7 million sq.m. IFA in 2011.
Step 5 - Develop the Forecast
Band
10. The
forecast range may be too large to be practical for planning
purposes. The forecast range can be narrowed down into a more
manageable forecast "band" by adopting one or more of
the following pragmatic approaches:
- review the theories
underpinning the equations as one or more of the
models may be too similar in nature;
- consider past trends and
the ability of the property market to absorb the
projected levels of take-up; and
- exclude any outlier
equations.
11. The
width of the band also needs to be pragmatically determined. It
should widen over time to reflect the increasing uncertainty over
time. A band widening to 10% of the lower limit is reasonable and
flexible for planning purposes. This can be based on 5% either
side of the mid-way point.
12. The
range produced for the 1997 forecasting was considered too large
to be practical for planning purposes. The range was narrowed
down to the band presented in Table A1.3 below using a
combination of the above criteria.
Table
A1.3 The Forecasting Band
[ Simple
Table Format ]
Year
|
Total Demand for
Retail Floorspace (million sq.m. IFA)
|
Lower Band
|
Mid-Point
|
Upper Band
|
1996
|
7.6
|
7.7
|
7.8
|
2001
|
8.2
|
8.4
|
8.7
|
2006
|
8.7
|
9.1
|
9.4
|
2011
|
9.2
|
9.7
|
10.1
|

|